Huwebes, Agosto 29, 2013

Student Underachievement



Student Underachievement

OUTLINE


I.                   INTRODUCTION
a.      Situation
b.     Definition

II.                 CAUSES / INDICATORS
a.      Personal Factors
b.     School  Factors
c.      Home life Factors

III.              EFFECTS / IMPACT
a.      Personal Impact
b.     School Tradition
c.      Home Life Situation

IV.              SOLUTIONS / PARADIGM
a.      Self Awareness Enhancement
b.     School Assessment on the Appropriate Instructional Practices
c.      Parents/ Guardians’ Empowerment Series

V.                 CONCLUSION










Student Underachievement

I.                   Introduction

Student underachievement in the K-12 curriculum has been a major concern of most educational

institutions. In one way or another, most learners experience some sense of gap between their ability and

what they can actually achieve in school ( Coil, 2007).   Their underachievement has been viewed in various

ways manifested in their projects, activities, performances, tests, outputs or GPA ( grade point average)

where they could have put more effort than they actually did. This situation has posed an enormous daily

challenge on the teachers to begin reflecting on the question: Why do our students have suddenly fallen out of

love with learning? How do we lead them towards achieving their full potential? This paper intends to

address these issues to expose the main reasons behind the problem as well as to propose possible solutions

that all proponents may utilize to help resolve the 
predicament.  

Indeed, both previous questions open wide the issue on the multi-faceted causes of

underachievement’s occurrence and a multitude of its effects on the students’ life. The main concern of

most teachers, however, comprise how all learners can attain their optimal learning ( i.e. the concepts

learned and their application to new learning situations) with high quality content ( i.e. their personal

 experiences, interests, blended with the prescribed curricula and national standards
)( White Paper,

n.d.,
p. 1). This would call for the appropriate teaching techniques educators may employ that can match 

what they know about how their students learn best ( Muir, n.d., p. 1).

Considered as a discrepancy between a learner’s performance and some ability index such as IQ

score (Delisle, 1990), student underachievement  poses a wide array of reasons  derived  from various

factors. In a particular study conducted among selected schools in the Philippines, Evins Kumandong

(2009) provided four factors contributing to the underachievement of students, namely: school, home,

peers and personal/self. The focus of this paper will simple include three of those factors – school, home

and self/personal.

II.                  Causes

                Signs of underachievement are seen in different curricular levels. Most of the students

experiencing this can be found in the middle school, high school and even in the tertiary level. Early

incidents of underachievement  occur among the primary and elementary boys. Some girls, though less

noticed, underachieve in the intermediate year/s believing the it isn’t “cool” to be competitive. Hence,

they rather prefer to avoid exhibiting their brightness for if they do, the boys will not like them.

                Underachievement flourish in the middle school and high school levels. Many of  these students

show some difficulty in establishing their sense of focus or concentration, laziness, unresponsiveness to

teacher’s support and consistently yield low scores in their major examinations and performance tests.
               
Additionally, their underachievement may also be caused by the traditional structure of the

school itself emphasizing the orderly straight rows of the desks, quiet learning, and compliant behavior.

Thus, there are some instances when students show no interest in class activities because they suffer

some form of bullying from their peers. There are also cases when they have to deal with some teachers

who establish either impossible or low standards, who can be too strict, or repressive and lack the

patience with the learners who ask difficult questions, seldom conform, and express divergent thinking.

Coil (2007) confirms that the traditional and conforming nature of the school setting, inappropriate

 curricula, days and weeks spent in drills and practice for standardized tests, inflexibility of scheduling or

curriculum context, and seemingly oppressive scenarios inherent in it can make underachieving

students.

                  Moreover, underachieving students  often are products of families in turmoil under stress or

over-committed. Their families are bombarded by marital discord, job pressures, financial constraints,

lack emotional support, absence of quality time, isolation from extended family. All these overshadow

their educational endeavors which become less prioritized. Left in the survival mode, a child / learner

may achieve but  for his/her family it may not be essential anymore.

On the contrary, some parents may still demand high grades without checking whether the kids

are actually learning anything. Worse, some instances  may lead to counteridentification where parents

may overly identify with the successes or failures of a child (Kumendong, 2009). In the end, the child

may think that he/she could never live up to parental expectations. In a family, if there is someone who

becomes an achiever the other may become a rebel against the pressure to achieve.

III.                Effects

                The abovementioned indicators of underachievement have led to some effects / outcomes

 which urgently need careful attention. First, not achieving enough provide negative deposits on the

mind of the learner which may further develop his/her negative inner-self attitude. Hence, they become

bored, less motivated, non-performing.  In the same manner, these students  do not have the chance to

maximize their learning (Zemsky, et al, 2005). 

Second,  traditional schools contribute to underachievement making the students feel frustrated

because the curriculum does not challenge them nor respond to their needs. If a gifted student is

provided by concepts that are familiar to him/her and is presented in one and the same approach

( without differentiation), he/she will soon perceive that school is “boring” and isn’t the right place to

learn anything new. Evidences established show that the educational system has transmitted unrealistic

role expectations but has failed to meet the changing needs of students.

Third, underachieving students come from families where there is a considerable instability

within the unit.  If a child does not find enough support from his/her respective family,  whatever he/she

achieve or not achieve will not matter anymore because day-to-day survival is the focus of life. In

extreme cases, some hungry children are found “apathetic, lethargic, unable to pay attention for the

periods and are often irritable and agitated” ( Karablum, 1991).  In short, hunger interferes with learning

and intellectual development.

If survival is not an issue, parents may be overly concerned leaving the children confused,

stressed, and frustrated  because they have to live up to the pressure or parental expectations.

Children have already formed their attitude about themselves and others based on the

messages that they have received from their parents, mentors, adult friends, and from a variety of

societal factors such as school, church, and family. These greatly affect their optimal learning.

In summary, the causes and effects of students’ underachievement cannot be blamed on any

sole influence. Instead, it is but proper for every sector to do its share in redressing the existing

inequalities, and revisit and come up with appropriate solutions to resolve the issue at hand.

IV.                Solutions

Over the decades, educators concerned with issues on underachievement have finally come up

with a common stand regarding the said situation: this is a call for a more learner-centered models of

schooling (Learner-Centered Principles Work Group of American Psychological Association’s Board Of

Educational Affairs, 1997). Considering this, the following proposed solutions are but humble attempts

to help lessen if not entirely eradicate the problem regarding underachievement.

Understanding underachievement in the right context will provide a solid step towards

solutions. Underachievement, in spite of its causes and effects, is primarily a behavior, which means, it

can be modified. Therefore, it is but essential to remember that it would be best not to label a student

as an underachiever but to label the behavior itself. For instance, the child is “underachieving in

Mathematics and Science” rather than an “underachieving student” ( Delisle, 1990).

If students exhibit such a behavior, many of them simply lack basic study skills, time

 management, and organizational skills. Hence, they ought to be given a Self-Awareness and Study Skills

Inventory. Once the needs are carefully identified, their mentors may start training them towards

the enhancement of  the said skills.

Furthermore, schools have to begin revisiting their vision-mission to assess the relevance of the

training that they provide for their learners. Likewise, it will be a chance to rekindle that passion among

the members of the entire institution to include every child in meaningful and engaged learning. This

eventually means using the pedagogical techniques that are most appropriate with the diverse

classrooms.

 Likewise, the schools may utilize the following strategies suggested by Delisle and Berger( 1991)

to reverse underachievement:

Supportive Strategies include classroom techniques and designs which will allow the child to feel

–at-home and customize the curricular activities to fit his/her differing needs.

Intrinsic  Strategies underscore the idea that student’s self concept as a learner is linked closely

to his/her desire to achieve academically.

Remedial Strategies allow to recognize the imperfections of the students as well as their

strengths and weaknesses. These strategies will provide the students chances to excel in their areas of

strength and interest while opportunities are given in specific areas of learning deficiencies.

When students are intrinsically motivated the more they are involved in the learning process.

While the extrinsically motivated prefer to work on tasks that are low in degree of difficulty and exert

minimal effort required.

Teachers may also setup classrooms that encourage motivation. The atmosphere must be foster

a sense of belongingness,  care, and support. A non-threatening classroom climate will ensure

participation. With materials that are relevant and skills specifically taught in class, the students may use

and apply the skills in the real world( Lumsden, 1994).    

The school administrators must enjoin all the parents and guardians to take an active

participation and do their share in empowering their children. They must be involved in an

Empowerment Series of training and seminars to upgrade themselves and join hands together with

other struggling parents to establish a kind of support group for parents and guardians.

All of these attempts must be recognized by all parents and guardians to ensure that all efforts

are done for the benefit of their children’s optimal learning as members of the next generation shaping

their own history.
                 


REFERENCES

Coil C. (2007). Underachievement: What is it? What causes it? E-zine, Vol. 1,3.

Committee on Academic Programs ad Teaching ( CAPT) ( 2005). Learner-Centered Teaching and

Education at USC: A Resource for Faculty. USC. pp. 1-9

Delisle J. and Berger S. Understanding Gifted Students. ERIC EC Digest #478, 1990 Retrieved from
     

Kerablum W. Sociology in a Changing World. NY, Holt Rhinehart and Winston, Inc.1991

Kumandong, E. N. (2009). Factors Contributing to Underachievement of Students in a Junior                      
             Academy –
A Qualitative Study. AIIAS Leslie Harding Library Curriculum and Instruction      
         
             Resource Center 
Linking Education.

Learner-Centered Principles Work Group of the American Psychological Association’s Board of

Educational Affairs.  Learner-Centered Principles: A Framework for School Reform and
           
 Redesign. (American Psychological Association, November 1997.)

Lumsden L. Student Motivation to Learn.ERIC Digest Number 92, 1994.

Muir M. What do Underachieving Middle School Students Believe Motivates Them to Learn?            
             Retrieved from http://www.memeLorg/motivatingUA.html

White Paper 2. ( n.d.). The Underachieving Student. Ford. Pp. 1-6

Zemsky R., Wegner G., Massy W. Remaking the American University: Market –Smart and Mission-


                Centered. (Rutgers University Press, 2005).

Walang komento:

Mag-post ng isang Komento